Thursday, April 03, 2008

Now You See Him Now You Don't

Luke 24
Now on that same day two of them were going to a village called Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem, 14 and talking with each other about all these things that had happened. 15 While they were talking and discussing, Jesus himself came near and went with them, 16 but their eyes were kept from recognizing him. 17 And he said to them, “What are you discussing with each other while you walk along?” They stood still, looking sad. 18 Then one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answered him, “Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have taken place there in these days?” 19 He asked them, “What things?” They replied, “The things about Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, 20 and how our chief priests and leaders handed him over to be condemned to death and crucified him. 21 But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since these things took place. 22 Moreover, some women of our group astounded us. They were at the tomb early this morning, 23 and when they did not find his body there, they came back and told us that they had indeed seen a vision of angels who said that he was alive. 24 Some of those who were with us went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said; but they did not see him.” 25 Then he said to them, “Oh, how foolish you are, and how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have declared! 26 Was it not necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and then enter into his glory?” 27 Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them the things about himself in all the scriptures. 28 As they came near the village to which they were going, he walked ahead as if he were going on. 29 But they urged him strongly, saying, “Stay with us, because it is almost evening and the day is now nearly over.” So he went in to stay with them. 30 When he was at the table with them, he took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened, and they recognized him; and he vanished from their sight. 32 They said to each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he was talking to us on the road, while he was opening the scriptures to us?” 33 That same hour they got up and returned to Jerusalem; and they found the eleven and their companions gathered together. 34 They were saying, “The Lord has risen indeed, and he has appeared to Simon!” 35 Then they told what had happened on the road, and how he had been made known to them in the breaking of the bread.

There is a meditation on this text from the Christian Century that has this paragraph
One Sunday I heard a preacher claim that the point of the Emmaus story is that we can recognize Jesus only in the broken bread. I hadn’t become an Episcopalian until I was in my 20s, so my inner Presbyterian child began to mutter, "And what about their hearts burning when they heard the word?" I was certain that I was missing some deep Anglican truth, so I sought out a fellow parishioner with a strong Anglo-Catholic bent, knowing that she would set me straight. I found her in the kitchen opening and slamming the cabinet doors. I ignored her frustration and asked her to explain how we find Jesus only in the Eucharist. She answered me between gritted teeth: "That’s just baloney! It’s all about power. If Jesus is only in the bread, then the priest is the only one who can dole him out, as it were.”


I know that is a bit much, but here is my point in quoting it- - >
Luke says that the knowing is in the “breaking of the bread.” I suspect the priest was a bit off in pointing to worship. The meditation I quote goes off and finds the knowing in “the everyday” in “hospitality”. But Luke says that the opening of the scriptures is to show that the suffering was “necessary” - that the scriptures pointed to Jesus. Luke says
“Then they told what had happened on the road, and how he had been made known to them in the breaking of the bread. . .”
Looking back to Luke 22 we hear. . .
“This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
Susan Briehl used this text to speak of the “heart of the matter” for worship. She spoke of the disciples walking the “sorrow road” with Jesus on the way to Emmaus.
Not only is Jesus made known in the breaking of the bread, the cross, the resurrection, the presence of God in this singular event is made known.
That might preach, but it seems kinda tough.
Easier to just say that you have to go to church and take communion. . .

2 comments:

The Underminer said...

I liked this from a conversation with Pay No Toll - "we don't look at the sacrament, but through the sacrament." To the cross - to Jesus.
Of course, we do not move to the point of suggesting that with Holy Communion "it's the thought that counts."
As Luther asks and answers
How can eating and drinking do all this?
It is not eating and drinking that does this, but the words, given and shed for you for the remission of sins. These words, along with eating and drinking, are the main thing in the sacrament. And whoever believes these words has exactly what they say, forgiveness of sins.

Along with. . . Part of what I want to point to is the great gift of God present with us in "the valley of the shadow"
He was made known to them in the breaking of the bread...

The Underminer said...

AND
when he was made known. . . doesn't that change EVERYTHING?