Luke 13: 1-9
"At that very time there were some present who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. 2He asked them, "Do you think that because these Galileans suffered in this way they were worse sinners than all other Galileans? 3No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all perish as they did. 4Or those eighteen who were killed when the tower of Siloam fell on them — do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others living in Jerusalem? 5No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all perish just as they did." 6Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it and found none. 7So he said to the gardener, 'See here! For three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree, and still I find none. Cut it down! Why should it be wasting the soil?' 8He replied, 'Sir, let it alone for one more year, until I dig around it and put manure on it. 9If it bears fruit next year, well and good; but if not, you can cut it down.'"
Here in Luke – the unfruitful fig tree is given more time and nurture in order that it will once again produce fruit. Can we say that it is a parable of grace or judgment ? Both ? The vineyard owner’s patience had worn out (3 years of waiting for fruit). He wanted to be rid of this fruitless tree…but the gardener appealed for mercy. “Sir, let it alone [Grk.= aphesis] for one more year, until I dig around it and put manure on it..” I wonder why it was that Jesus has the gardener being the messenger of grace and not the owner of the vineyard ? Are both the vineyard owner and the gardener divine figures in the story ? [Grk.= aphesis] translates Let it alone….let it be…suffer, pardon, forgive. This is the same word which Jesus speaks from the cross – “Father, forgive (aphesis) them, for they know not what they do.” (Lk. 23: 34) In his book, The Parables of Grace, Robert Capon writes: “ The world lives, as the fig tree lives, under the rubric of forgiveness. The world, of course, thinks otherwise. In it’s blind wisdom, it thinks it lives by merit and reward.” (pg. 97)
Last week, Pay No Toll raised the question, How determined or stubborn is God ? Perhaps the question here is How far will God's patience extend ? How much time will God allow for us to repent...to turn back....before judgment comes - chop it down. Patience...let it be....let it alone. We live, as Capon says, like the fig tree lives...under the rubric of forgiveness. Isn't patience like forgiveness ? Hey, guys...thanks for putting up with me !
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Good work Vicar. And good questions. The Capon piece you sight reminds us that we do currently live under this word of grace. That truly is our reality at this moment. We have been given a reprieve. Our fruitlessness has been forgiven and the gardener is spreading manure upon us. (Wait, that doesn't sound as good as it should?!) As I ponder the question about how long do we have before we get cut down I wonder if the answer might be, "think about it differently." In the previous section Jesus seems to be telling people not to think those who had something bad happen are worse than them. Instead, repent yourselves. It makes me wonder if there is a sense of urgency to what he says. "Something happened? Take that as an opportunity to, yourself, return to trusting God." If so, the question, "How long do I have before I have to get serious about this?" is somehow a question that reveals a problem in my heart. (I'm struggling to find words here for what I'm trying to think.) "We urge you also not to accept the grace of God in vain...See, now is the acceptable time; see, now is the day of salvation!" (2Cor. 6:2.2 Ash Wed. reading) What makes NOW the day of salvation instead of tomorrow? If I have been given a reprieve why not kick back, the pressure is off. I'll trust God in the future sometime, at a time closer to the deadline. But if I am thinking about deadlines, what am I failing to hear? Have I failed to understand grace? Failed to be touched by it? (And what would it mean to accept the grace of God in vain anyway?) Oh boy, more confusion. Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death?
This text reminds me of the Old Testament text for Ash Wednesday. Joel suggesting that the great locust plague is a sign of God's judgment against sin and evil. The proper way to react to such a sign is to repent.
The sign here is the death of the Galileans by that suckwad Pilate. When Jesus hears word of the event he chooses to go the "sign of judgment/you better repent" route.
What do you all think of that approach to repentance and that view of God? How does the cross come into play? What does the cross say about judgment?
I am resonating with the point that the Vicar poses good questions. Unlike the disciples, the Vicar of Vice asks questions that give room for the Gospel.
We often kinda forget that the answers we get often depend a great deal on the questions we ask.
Do you think they're worse sinner? HA!
Perhaps Jesus' answer isn't at all about retribution, but about the wonderful grace of God. The joy of setting aside a vision of God as one who will smite terrible sinners, and is instead intent on living in relationship with you, and calling you to make God's kingdom a reality for all around you. . .
Jesus calls you to repent. . . calls you to receive the gifts of living in God's embrace. . .
The question is not - "when do I have to?" but - "When do I get to?"
HAVE I GOT A DEAL FOR YOU - YOU CAN REPENT RIGHT NOW!!!!
Who wouldn't?
I like this from Mary Hinkle Shore - the featured link on textweek this week
Jesus rejects retribution and yet calls for repentance. The fact that some of us (I speak for myself here) find our brains taxed when we try to hold these two thoughts together may indicate just how tied into retribution we still are. "If punishment is not directly related to sin, then—explain it to me again—why should I repent?" Luke might say simply, "It is necessary."
I agree. The questions are important. However, it's not like we can escape being stuck in asking the wrong questions (unless we become gnostic). We are in bondage to sin, after all. Furthermore, repentance sucks for Lutherans because it is something you actively do. We can't do it by our own effort. We need to be freed and empowered to do it. The problem is that Jesus telling me to repent ("Repent or you will perish!")does not free me. The Gospel frees. How does this text lead to a pronouncement of the Gospel?
The question of repentance being a work is problematic.
Is it?
When the metaphor is a tree. . .not much a tree can do but sit there. . . maybe get some manure put on it. . . some sunshine. . . a little rain. . .
Stoffregen quotes from purpose driven church and suggests that fruitfulness is believers making new believers. . . hmmmm kinda church growthie... what if my neighbor is hungry? Might fruit look more like fruit? And vegetables?
Yet, if my vision of the world is one of scarcity and judgment, I needn't give a rats patootie about the neighbor in need. He probably deserves to be hungry. Why else would God have him be so poor? He's a greater sinner.
Let me be glad that God has blessed me so. . .
or. . .
Stoffregen has good quotes too
Culpepper in the New Interpreters Bible
“The parable of the fig tree invites us to consider the gift of another year of life as an act of God's mercy. John the Baptist declared that the ax lay at the root, poised to strike (3:9). Any tree that did not bear fruit would be cut down. In Jesus' parable, however, the gardener pleads for and is granted one more year. The year that Jesus proclaimed, moreover, "the year of the Lord's favor" (4:19), would be a year of forgiveness, restoration, and second chances.
What would you do if you had only a year left to live, only a short time in which to make up for wrongs done and opportunities missed? How important that year might be! The lesson of the fig tree is a challenge to live each day as a gift from God. Live each day in such a way that you will have no fear of giving an account for how you have used God's gift.” [p. 272]
and
this poem by Toyohiko Kagawa:
I read
In a book
That a man called
Christ
Went about doing good.
It is very disconcerting to me
That I am so easily
Satisfied
With just
Going about.
Sad to admmit: often just going about - Underminer
I'm still rambling on the concern that we might see the call to repentance as - at root - a call to works, and therefore something quite other than grace.
In Romans we are encouraged - "Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God. . ." I like to see repentance as a coming alive to the truth about who God is, and therefore who we are. The wrath of God is not that God runs around smiting bad people. Rather, it is our perception of God that is the wrath. . .
I'm going to preach on "The Year of the Lord's Favor"
In light of the extra year for the tree, might repentance be seen as something quite different than a work? Might we see repentance as receiving the gift of the year, and there finding joy and love and life?
Must be Spring Training time, and the Twins haven’t lost any games yet!
Post a Comment